Algorithmic trading involves using computer programs to execute trades based on predefined criteria. AI takes this a step further by incorporating machine learning and deep learning techniques, enabling these algorithms to learn from vast amounts of data and make more informed decisions.

AI algorithms excel at analysing large datasets and identifying patterns that are not immediately apparent to human traders. Machine learning models can process historical market data, news articles, social media sentiment, and other relevant information to predict market movements with greater accuracy. For example, natural language processing (NLP) techniques allow AI to gauge market sentiment by analysing news headlines and social media posts, providing valuable insights into market trends.

AI-driven trading strategies are more adaptive and responsive to market changes. Reinforcement learning, a type of AI that learns from trial and error, can optimise trading strategies by continuously improving its decision-making process based on past performance. This dynamic approach helps in maximising returns and minimising risks.

One of the most significant advantages of AI in trading is the speed at which it can execute trades. AI algorithms can process and analyse data in real-time, allowing for quicker decision-making and execution of trades. This speed is crucial in high-frequency trading, where milliseconds can make a significant difference in profitability.

AI also enhances risk management by identifying potential risks and anomalies in trading patterns that may indicate fraudulent activities. Machine learning models can detect unusual trading behaviour and alert traders to potential risks, thereby safeguarding investments and maintaining market integrity.

Despite its benefits, the integration of AI in trading is not without challenges. Issues such as data quality and lack of transparency in AI decision-making processes can pose significant risks.

Furthermore, overfitting of models present another challenge. Overfitting occurs when models provide inaccurate statistics due to being too closely aligned to a limited data. Additionally, the regulatory landscape for AI-driven trading is still evolving, requiring firms to stay compliant with emerging regulations.

AI algorithms are undeniably transforming trading in the financial services sector, offering enhanced market predictions, improved trading strategies, and greater speed and efficiency. As technology continues to evolve, the role of AI in trading is likely to expand, bringing even more innovation and disruption to the financial markets. For firms willing to embrace these changes, the potential for increased profitability and competitive advantage is substantial.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Explore Telesoft's range of next-generation fintech solutions here:



The financial services sector has always been at the forefront of adopting new technologies to gain a competitive edge. In recent years, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms into trading has significantly transformed the landscape of financial markets. Here's a look at how AI is revolutionising trading strategies and improving market predictions.

How AI Algorithms Are Transforming Trading in the Financial Services Sector

As with all cyber threats, the likelihood of a cyber attack on the financial industry is not a case of if but a case of when; as reported by the IMF, the threat posed by ‘a major cyberattack… to financial stability is axiomatic.’ Indeed, in recent years, the financial and banking industry have seen a surge in the frequency and sophistication of cyber attacks. Unsurprisingly, the cost of a breach is extremely high in this sector, the average cost amounting to around £4.86 million.

This report provides an overview of the top cyber threats to the industry and recommendations on how financial institutions can improve their cyber security.

In the financial sector, the types of threat remain similar to other industries, although the consequences of a breach differ in that they are more likely to not just impact the targeted organisation, but also impact the wider economy as a whole.

Here are some of the main types of cyber attack that threaten the finance industry:

Phishing attacks are one of the most common types of cyber attack deployed by cyber criminals and they’re becoming increasingly advanced. Spear phishing, a type of phishing attack that involves prior research to create a more targeted and convincing attempt, is also becoming more common.

For example, in 2021, phishing scams targeted around 790 banking customers of OCBC, a Singaporean Bank, which ultimately led to a loss of an estimated $13.7 million.

In relation to phishing, fraud and identity theft are another huge threat to the financial industry. In 2022, the BBC reported that people in the UK lost £1.2bn to fraud. While banks and the finance sector have spent billions on detecting and preventing fraud, the majority of fraud originates outside the banking system, highlighting the need for there to be cross-sector engagement when seeking to prevent this kind of threat.

Ransomware is a type of malware that encrypts or steals an organisation’s data and only offers it in return in exchange for a ransom. In the financial sector, ransomware attacks could cause huge disruptions to organisations and their customers, as well as potentially resulting in reputational damage and regulatory fines. According to SOPHOS, 55% of financial service organisations were impacted by at least one ransomware attack in 2021. Of those impacted, 85% claimed the resulting impact lost the organisation business/revenue.

Distributed Denial of Service attacks are a common threat to the financial sector. Indeed, the finance sector appeared in the top three most targeted industries for DDoS attacks in 2021. These attacks consist of an attacker sending large amounts of traffic to overwhelm the target’s infrastructure, leading either to extreme latency or an inability to carry out usual operations. The financial services sector in the US has been targeted by DDoS attacks for many years, costing tens of millions.

The generation of cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin require huge computational power, which can be expensive. Crypto miners have been known to hack into organisation’s networks and utilise their devices to mine cryptocurrency, utilising anything from mobile phones to network servers. This can lead to latency issues and an increase in energy costs due to the intensive nature of cryptomining. With SonicWall reporting a 269% increase in cryptojacking attacks across the financial sector, it clearly is a significant threat that needs to be addressed.

Cyber Criminals are unsurprisingly one of the main culprits when it comes to cyber attacks on the financial sector. The largest motivation for an attack is usually money, which may be achieved through a ransomware attack or phishing. Cyber criminals may be hired by other malicious actors to carry out the attack, such as nation-states.

Nation-States with malicious intent can also be responsible for cyber attacks on financial organisations. Motivations are varied but they usually aim to destabilise the targeted country’s economy. For example, North Korea are thought to be responsible for multiple attacks, including the 2016 Bangladesh cyber-heist, where an attempted $1 billion dollars was attempted to be withdrawn from the central bank of Bangladesh.

Similar to the motivations of nation-states, terrorist groups may launch cyber attacks to destabilise their targets and bring down vital financial infrastructure. While there are currently few significant examples of what can truly be defined as cyberterrorism, the growing sophistication of cyber attacks highlights that this risk should not be ignored.

A cyber attack can lead to financial loss due to disruptions of usual services. For example, a ransomware attack may lock down an organisation’s data and prevent them from being able to operate, and, therefore, lose business. In addition, ransomware attackers demand a payment or ransom in order to unlock affected systems or to not expose sensitive data, which, again, can cost businesses millions. Fraud can also lead to significant financial loss.

The average cost of an attack is 40% higher for financial services compared to other sectors according to a report by Accenture. Here are just some of the costs that feed into the overall impact of a breach.

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has the power to issue substantial fines to organisations that suffer data breaches as a result of cyber attacks if they are found to have failed in their duty to protect personal data. An ICO fine can have serious financial implications for a business, especially a small or medium-sized enterprise.

For serious breaches within the UK, the ICO have the power to issue fines of up to £17.5 million or 4% of your annual worldwide turnover, depending on which is higher. The ICO focuses the use of its enforcement powers on cases involving recklessness or deliberate harm, their approach will be proportionate on a case by case basis. The ICO considers the amount of time the threat went unnoticed, the measures in place to prevent a breach, as well as the kind of data compromised. The more negligent and damaging these factors are, the heavier the fine. However, the ICO are unlikely to take enforcement action against any organisation genuinely seeking to comply with the provisions of the legislation.

The cost of a breach is also often exacerbated by the resulting loss in customer trust in an organisation. If customers feel their sensitive data and, particularly for the finance sector, their money is accessible to cyber criminals, then they are unlikely to wish to use or continue to use that organisation. Indeed, a report found that around 40% of the costs of a cyber incident stem from reputational damage, with Forbes stating a cyber attack can lead to a 7% fall in a company’s share price.

Many breaches are made possible due to existing vulnerabilities within an organisation’s network. Ensuring rigorous standards of keeping all software updated as part of a scheduled patch management process can help fix vulnerabilities before they are exploited by adversaries.

Implementing MFA is strongly advised by cyber security professionals. It provides organisations with extra layers of security rather than simply relying on passwords as a form of authentication. MFA could utilise mobile devices, time-based one-time passwords (TOTP), as well as multiple other kinds of authentication. However, MFA does not offer complete protection, as showcased by the MGM Resorts attack where the cyber attacker was able to get around the MFA measures in place.

1 in 3 cyber attacks occur as a result of phishing. Ultimately all cyber attacks come down to some form of human error and we all have a responsibility to bare when it comes to cyber security. Raising employee awareness on things like how to identify phishing attacks and overall cyber housekeeping can help organisations address these risks.

IAM tools are becoming increasingly popular and for good reason. They provide organisations with a centralised platform to implement access controls, helping reduce the risk of a breach. However, if not managed properly, IAM platforms also present a huge cyber security risk if a breach occurs. This is because, once in, cyber attackers can potentially alter access controls

How Telesoft’s Solutions Help Fortify Cyber Security

Telesoft Technologies are a UK-based cyber security and network monitoring company with 34+ years of experience. Primarily working with governments and tier-one telecommunication organisations, we specialise in producing high-rate, bespoke solutions tailored to every organisation we work with. Backed by our team of talented engineers, who recently enabled us to achieve 400GbE, we have the capability to tailor our solutions to address your organisation’s needs.

The TDAC Platform is the complete solution for network monitoring, threat detection, and data retention. Powered by our latest FPGA-enhanced developments, the TDAC Platform consists of our suite of powerful probes and sensors, providing full network visibility at line-rate (L2-L7). Combined with machine learning algorithms and the latest threat intelligence, the TDAC Platform allows cyber analysts to work efficiently and effectively.

Capable of storing petabytes worth of data for 12+ months, the TDAC Platform also provides analysts with the capability to carry out historical analysis across stored data. Performing full line-rate intrusion detection, the TDAC Platform provides users with real-time updates of detected threats via the ‘single pane of glass’ monitoring interface.

Our UK Managed SOC Service provides organisations with the reassurance of their network being monitored 24/7 by our expert team of cyber analysts. Utilising the latest threat intelligence and threat hunting capability, our team will monitor your network for suspicious and malicious activity, alerting within as little as 15 minutes depending on severity.

Our analysts will also continuously assess your network for vulnerabilities, offering remediation advice on any threats or vulnerabilities detected to elevate your organisation’s cyber security posture.

The rise in sophistication and frequency of cyber attacks poses a significant threat to the financial sector. As highlighted in this report, the financial sector is a popular target for cyber attackers and the costs of a breach are more significant than in the majority of other sectors.

While preventative measures such as implementing MFA and raising cyber awareness play an important role in reinforcing cyber security, organisations need to be prepared for the ever-increasing eventuality of a breach.

Telesoft’s range of advanced cyber solutions help organisation’s detect the early signs of a breach and provide remediation advice to stop the threat from escalating. Paired with the preventative approaches suggested in this report, organisations within the financial sector can significantly increase their cyber security posture and mitigate against the risks posed by a cyber attack.

The Rising Cost & Frequency of Cyber Risks to the Financial Sector 

Addressing Cyber Security Threats to the Financial Sector

The financial industry operates in a fast-paced, high-stakes environment where every millisecond can make a difference. In such a setting, the detection of microbursts and the reduction of latency are of utmost importance. This article will delve into the significance of these two factors in the financial sector and explore how they interplay. Through case studies and insights into emerging technologies, the article also explores the consequences of ignoring microbursts and high latency, and how leveraging technology can lead to improved detection and latency reduction, reducing potential financial and reputational damages.

Understanding Microbursts in the Financial Sector

Before delving into the intricacies of microburst detection, it is crucial to understand what microbursts are and their characteristics. Microbursts refer to sudden, intense spikes in network traffic that occur over a very short duration. These bursts can overload networks, leading to delays and disruptions in financial transactions.

Microbursts have a profound impact on financial transactions. High-frequency trading, for instance, heavily relies on split-second transactions. A microburst can disrupt the smooth flow of data, resulting in delayed trades or missed opportunities. The financial consequences of such disruptions can be staggering, making it imperative for financial institutions to invest in robust microburst detection systems.

One of the key characteristics of microbursts is their short duration. These bursts typically last for a few milliseconds, making them difficult to detect without specialised tools. Financial institutions must employ sophisticated monitoring systems that can analyse network traffic in real-time and identify patterns indicative of microbursts.

Financial institutions also need to consider the potential impact of microbursts on their infrastructure. These bursts can overload network switches, routers, and servers, leading to increased latency, jitter, and risk of packet loss. It is crucial for organisations to regularly assess their network capacity and ensure that it can handle the sudden surge in traffic caused by microbursts.

Another aspect to consider is the geographical distribution of network traffic. Microbursts can occur in specific regions or within a single data centre. This localised nature of microbursts requires financial institutions to have a comprehensive view of their network infrastructure and monitor traffic patterns across different locations.

Moreover, financial institutions should not only focus on detecting microbursts but also on responding to them effectively. When a microburst is detected, organisations must have automated processes in place to reroute traffic, allocate additional resources, or implement other measures to minimise the impact on financial transactions.

The Role of Latency in Financial Operations

Latency, defined as the time it takes for data to travel from one point to another, is another critical factor in financial operations. In the context of finance, even microseconds matter. High latency can lead to delayed trades, inefficient order routing, and missed market opportunities. For financial institutions, reducing latency is not just a matter of efficiency; it directly impacts their bottom line.

Financial operations rely heavily on the speed and accuracy of data transmission. In today's fast-paced and highly competitive financial markets, every millisecond counts. Traders and investors strive to execute transactions at lightning-fast speeds to take advantage of fleeting market conditions. However, high latency can undermine these efforts and result in significant financial losses.

Consider a scenario where a trader wants to execute a buy order for a particular stock. The success of this trade depends on receiving up-to-date market data and executing the order before market conditions change. However, if there is a significant delay in receiving the market data due to high latency, the trader may miss the opportunity to buy the stock at the desired price, resulting in a lost opportunity for profit.

Furthermore, high latency can also impact order routing, which is the process of directing trade orders to the appropriate exchanges or trading venues. In a highly fragmented market, where multiple exchanges and alternative trading venues compete for order flow, efficient order routing is crucial. However, if there is a delay in transmitting orders due to latency issues, the trade execution may be suboptimal, leading to increased costs and reduced profitability.

Another area where latency plays a critical role is in real-time monitoring and risk management systems. Financial institutions heavily rely on these systems to detect and respond to potential threats and vulnerabilities. However, if there is a delay in receiving and processing real-time data due to high latency, the effectiveness of these systems may be compromised. This can leave financial institutions exposed to risks such as fraudulent activities, market manipulations, or system failures.

Therefore, understanding the effects of high latency and taking proactive steps to minimise it is crucial to ensuring the stability and security of financial operations. Financial institutions invest significant resources in optimising their networks, leveraging advanced technologies, and implementing low-latency infrastructure to gain a competitive edge in the market. By reducing latency, they can improve trade execution, enhance order routing efficiency, and strengthen their risk management capabilities.

The Interplay Between Microburst Detection and Latency Reduction

Microburst detection and latency reduction are two intertwined aspects of creating a robust and efficient financial infrastructure. One widely adopted technique to reduce latency is algorithmic trading, which involves using complex algorithms to execute high-speed trades based on predefined conditions. This approach leverages automation and advanced computing power to execute trades in milliseconds, minimising the time taken to process transactions and reducing latency.

In addition to algorithmic trading, proximity hosting is another effective method for reducing latency. Financial institutions can host their servers in data centres located close to major financial exchanges. This physical proximity significantly reduces the time it takes for data to travel between the servers and the exchanges, resulting in lower latency and faster execution of trades.

Furthermore, utilising low-latency networks is another key strategy for reducing latency in financial systems. These networks are specifically designed to minimise delays and ensure fast transmission of data. By leveraging low-latency networks, financial institutions can optimise their connectivity and achieve improved response times, resulting in reduced latency and enhanced system performance.

When combined with effective microburst detection systems, these latency reduction strategies work synergistically to minimise disruptions and ensure smoother financial operations. Microbursts, which refer to sudden bursts of high network traffic, can cause congestion and latency spikes in financial systems. However, by promptly detecting microbursts and implementing appropriate measures, such as traffic rerouting or load balancing, financial institutions can mitigate their impact and maintain optimal system performance.

It is worth noting that the interplay between microburst detection and latency reduction is a continuous process. Financial institutions need to constantly monitor their networks, analyse traffic patterns, and adapt their strategies accordingly. This dynamic approach ensures that any emerging microbursts are promptly detected and latency is effectively reduced, enabling financial systems to operate smoothly even during periods of high demand.

Case Studies: The Consequences of Ignoring Microbursts and High Latency

To drive home the importance of microburst detection and latency reduction, it is essential to examine past incidents and the consequences they had on the financial industry. Notable failures resulting from microburst and latency issues serve as cautionary tales, highlighting the potential risks involved.

One such case study is the infamous "Flash Crash" of 2010. This incident, which occurred on May 6th, sent shockwaves through the financial markets. Within a matter of minutes, the Dow Jones Industrial Average plunged nearly 1,000 points, only to recover most of the losses shortly after. The cause? A combination of high-frequency trading algorithms, microbursts, and high latency. The rapid influx of trades triggered a cascade effect, exacerbating the market volatility and causing panic among investors.

Another notable case study is the Knight Capital Group's trading debacle in 2012. In a span of just 45 minutes, the firm suffered a loss of $440 million due to a software glitch that triggered a series of unintended trades. The glitch, caused by a combination of microbursts and high latency, resulted in the execution of numerous erroneous orders, leading to significant financial losses and reputational damage for the company.

By analysing these case studies, financial institutions can gain valuable insights into the vulnerabilities they face and develop proactive measures to avoid similar scenarios. Learning from past incidents also underscores the need for continuous improvements in microburst detection and latency reduction techniques.

One approach that has emerged from these case studies is the implementation of robust risk management systems. Financial institutions now recognise the importance of monitoring network traffic for signs of microbursts and latency issues. By deploying advanced analytics tools, they can identify abnormal patterns and take preventive actions before they escalate into catastrophic events.

Furthermore, the adoption of low-latency trading systems has become a priority for many firms. These systems aim to minimise the time it takes for trade orders to be executed, thereby reducing the potential impact of microbursts and latency on market stability. By investing in cutting-edge technology and infrastructure, financial institutions can stay competitive and mitigate the risks associated with these phenomena.

Additionally, collaboration between financial institutions and technology vendors has become crucial in addressing microburst and latency challenges. By working together, they can share best practices, exchange knowledge, and develop innovative solutions to enhance microburst detection and latency reduction capabilities. This collaborative approach ensures that the financial industry stays at the forefront of technological advancements and remains resilient in the face of evolving risks.

 is a high-rate network monitoring system designed specifically to provide data analytics and microburst detection across the global exchange market. Finance Probe provides unsampled, line-rate monitoring of all traffic traversing your network at up to 1.6Tbps (4 x 400GbE or 16 x 100GbE). Flow analytics and Microburst Analysis can be used to measure link capacity and overall network performance, minimising the risk of latency and packet loss, while ensuring high-quality service fulfilment continues to be met.

Additionally, Finance Probe provides nanosecond resolution traffic monitoring at line-rate utilising PTP timestamping, which enables granular visibility and analysis of microbursts across your entire network. Microbursts will be identified and alerted to the user; alerts contain a nanosecond timestamp and flow analytics from the nanosecond(s) period of detection.

 also helps organisations increase their network capacity in the face of ever-increasing data rates. Telesoft’s solution allows organisations to upgrade their infrastructure, reducing the risk of latency and packet loss, providing them with actionable flow analytics and microburst alerts based upon user-defined thresholds.

In conclusion, the consequences of ignoring microbursts and high latency can be severe, as demonstrated by the case studies mentioned above. Financial institutions must learn from these incidents and take proactive measures to mitigate the risks associated with these phenomena. By investing in advanced analytics, low-latency trading systems, and fostering collaboration, they can enhance their capabilities and safeguard their operations in an increasingly interconnected and fast-paced financial landscape. Microbursts are expected and are not something that organisations should seek to eradicate; instead, they should look to be able to handle these expected bursts.

By understanding the nature of microbursts, the impact of high latency, and the interplay between these two factors, financial institutions can make informed decisions to protect their business interests and mitigate risks. Furthermore, keeping a close eye on past incidents and embracing emerging technologies, such as the 

, will help shape a resilient financial industry that thrives in the face of evolving challenges.

RESOURCES

Finance

Finance

How AI Algorithms Are Transforming Trading in the Financial Services Sector

Finance

Addressing Cyber Security Threats to the Financial Sector

Finance

The Importance of Microburst Detection and Reduced Latency in the Financial Industry

Resources Hub